Analysis Of David Hume s Theory Of Justice - 2868 Words

Ethics: A simple concept that many of us say we understand and try to incorporate in our day to day activities. Yet when we look at the application of ethics, we see that it is the interpretation that causes so many problems. Let us look at a seemingly simple concept: Property ownership. David Hume defined property as nothing but a stable possession under the mutually respected understanding of society. Basically, Man creates society to enforce justice which allows man to own and use property as he desires. A grand idea but is it so simple? If Man creates society to protect this arbitrary concept, does society have the right to take this right away? John Rawls felt that society was responsible for deciding who properly owns property, whether it s individually or communally owned. In his influential work, A Theory of Justice, Rawls conception of society is defined by justice as fairness. Essentially saying that social institutions must be open and fair to all, and while wealth and p ower may be distributed unequally, this distribution must be for the benefit of all. While John Rawls had little to say in regards to property, it is his theory of â€Å"justice as fairness† which debates the ethics of eminent domain. In order to understand the ethical debate of eminent domain, we must first explore how property has been viewed over the centuries from Plato through Jean Jacques Rousseau. It is not the words of these philosophers that creates so much confusion, rather theirShow MoreRelatedMedieval And Modern Ethics1745 Words   |  7 Pagesraised is asking how would Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther King, Jr., David Hume, and Nel Noddings handle the situation of turning children away. In the light of the question being so complex I plan on explaining first Thomas Aquinas and where he stood on the matter of morality, then I will follow that by breaking down essentially what Dr.King meant when he explained his duty to the South, After touching on Dr.King I will go on to David Humes to break down his skepticism and apply his view to the questionRead MoreEssay about On Emotion and Value in David Hume and Max Scheler2870 Words   |  12 PagesOn Emotion and Value in David Hume and Max Scheler ABSTRACT: While some philosophers tend to exclude any significance of emotion for the moral life, others place them in the center of both the moral life and the theory of value judgment. This paper presents a confrontation of two classic positions of the second type, namely the position of Hume and Scheler. The ultimate goal of this confrontation is metatheoretical — particularly as it concerns the analysis of the relations between the idea ofRead More Humes Wide Construal of the Virtues Essay3865 Words   |  16 Pagesis clear. Humes analysis of the virtues departs from this tradition both in terms of the quantity of virtues discussed and their obvious moral significance. A conservative estimate of the various virtues Hume refers to in his moral writings would put the number at around seventy, with the more untraditional ones including wit, good manners, and dialog. Unsurprisingly, Humes critics have attacked him for making nonsense of the concept of virtue by construing it so widely. Hume was aware that hisRead MoreEssay about Adam Smith Father of Economics5633 Words   |  23 Pagesmodern economics, Smith is an author of The Theory of Moral Sentiments and An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nation, now known to be called The Wealth of Nations. Smith is commonly cited as the father of modern economics. Smith studied moral philosophy at the University of Glasgow and Oxford University. After graduating, he delivered a successful series of public lectures at Edinburgh, leading him to collaborate with Economist, David Hume, during the Scottish Enlightenment. SmithRead MoreCarbon Taxing : Moving Towards An Efficient Economy2418 Words   |  10 Pages ANALYSIS Rawls Versus Nozick John Rawls and Robert Nozick, two of the most influential scholars of the 20th century in the great debate about Justice, have highly contradicting reviews. The justice we are talking about is not the legal justice or justice in terms of power, here we focus on justice in terms of distribution of resources in the society among the people in that society, or simply put, Distributive Justice. According to Rawls, in his book, â€Å"A Theory of Justice†, principlesRead MoreBranches of Philosophy8343 Words   |  34 Pagesassociated with the idea of morality. Platos early dialogues include a search for definitions of virtue. †¢ Political philosophy is the study of government and the relationship of individuals and communities to the state. It includes questions about justice, the good, law, property, and the rights and obligations of the citizen. †¢ Aesthetics deals with beauty, art, enjoyment, sensory-emotional values, perception, and matters of taste and sentiment. †¢ Logic deals with patterns of thinking thatRead MoreThe Idea Of Basic Goods3662 Words   |  15 Pages(Project Report to the Term Paper towards the partial fulfillment of the assessment in the subject Jurisprudence-I) Submitted By: Submitted To: Abhinav Raj (1182) Mr. S. K. Kaushik B.A., LL.B Faculty of Jurisprudence III Semester AishwaryaTripathi (1188) B.A., LL.B III Semester Submitted on-17/08/2015 NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR SUMMER SESSION (JULY-NOVEMBER 2015) Acknowledgement A major researchRead More12 Angry Men - Analysis3445 Words   |  14 Pagesfather. At the heart of the deliberations is to prove that the teen is â€Å"guilty beyond a reasonable doubt† and the twelve men spar in this film for one and one-half hours in a New York City court deliberation room on a very hot, summer day. (Lumet, S. (Director). (1957). 12 Angry Men (Motion Picture). United States: MGM Studios – Video DVD) Some of the jurors are uncomfortable with being entrusted with the power to send this young teen to the electric chair, and just like their diverse backgrounds;Read MoreCriticisms Against Ethical Theories8474 Words   |  34 PagesCriticisms leveled against Ethical Theories 1. Criticisms leveled against Consequentialism. Consequentialism is based on the consequences of actions. It is sometimes called a teleological theory, from the Greek word telos, meaning goal. According to consequentialism, actions are right or wrong depending on whether their consequences further the goal. The goal (or, the good) can be something like the happiness of all people or the spreading of peace and safety. Anything which contributes toRead MoreThe Legality, Morality, and Social Responsibility of the Affordable Care Act and Florida Blue.5116 Words   |  21 Pagesbased on your income you get it for free or you pay a very small amount. The United States has waited a long time to enact this law and should be enforce. Despite evidence to the contrary, explained in the joint dissent the Chief Justice named Roberts, along with 4 other Justices Breyer, Ginsberg, Kagan, and Sotomayor upheld Obamacare’s â€Å"penalty imposed upon individuals’ failure to purchase federally-approved health insurance (the Individua l Mandate) as within Congress’ taxing power.† A majority of the